9 Signals That Matter | Week of June 19, 2026

What you need to know in the music business this week

1. POLICY WATCH

The NO FAKES Act Just Cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee

For the first time, real bipartisan momentum is building behind federal legislation that would protect every American's voice and likeness from unauthorized AI deepfakes and clones, not just celebrities and public figures.

The NO FAKES Act (formally the Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe Act) passed the Senate Judiciary Committee this week. Senators Dick Durbin, Katie Britt, Mazie Hirono, Ashley Moody, Peter Welch, and Adam Schiff added their support, joining a coalition that already included Senators Marsha Blackburn, Chris Coons, Thom Tillis, and Amy Klobuchar. RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Glazier called the committee passage encouraging and said the organization expects the bill to become law later this year.

What the bill would actually do matters more than the political theater around it. It creates one national rule rather than a patchwork of state laws. It expressly protects First Amendment uses like news reporting and parody. It reduces the threat of costly litigation by letting platforms avoid liability when they promptly remove unauthorized deepfakes. It builds in a counter-notice process so legitimate content doesn't get wrongly taken down. And it protects educational and research institutions.

The detail worth sitting with is the coalition behind it. RIAA cites support from child safety groups, free market organizations, labor unions, free speech advocates, and AI developers themselves. That's not a typical alignment. When groups that usually disagree on regulation all show up behind the same bill, that tells you something about how broadly the deepfake problem is actually being felt.

For independent artists, this matters more than it might initially seem. Up to now, voice and likeness protection has functioned more like privilege than right. Famous artists like Lionel Richie can afford to file trademark applications on their own voice. Most working musicians can't, and don't have the leverage to fight unauthorized AI clones of their work even if they wanted to. The NO FAKES Act, if it passes, would extend that same baseline protection to every American regardless of fame or resources.

This isn't law yet. Committee passage is a real step, not a finish line. But the momentum is genuine, and RIAA's public push for passage this year is worth taking seriously. If you've been waiting for legislation to catch up to the AI voice cloning problem that's been building for years, this is the bill that's actually moving.

2, ARTIST MINDSET

What Your Manager Actually Wishes You Knew

Every artist has had the moment. Something feels urgent, the manager says wait, and the frustration builds before the reason ever gets explained.

Here's the reframe worth sitting with: managers aren't gatekeepers. They're translators. When they slow something down, it's usually protection, of the artist, the partner, and the opportunity itself. And most independent managers are running five separate jobs at once, legal, financial, creative, logistical, emotional, without a department behind them to absorb any of it.

That doesn't mean every manager is doing it well. But the next time a manager's pace feels like an obstacle, it's worth asking what they're actually protecting before assuming they're simply in the way.

3. LEGAL WATCH

Google's Position Just Hardened: "We Don't Need AI Licenses at All"

Two weeks ago Google argued in federal court that YouTube's terms of service constituted consent for AI training. This week the position escalated into something more direct.

In its ongoing legal battle against independent musicians, Google now claims that accusations of content infringement are simply irrelevant, because the company asserts it already holds the rights to use millions of songs for AI training, however much or little it wants.

That's not a nuanced legal defense anymore. That's a claim of essentially unlimited access to an entire catalog of independently created work. The musicians suing Google are arguing this directly contradicts how rights have always worked in this industry. The case is far from resolved, but the confidence behind Google's escalating position tells you something about how the company views the leverage in this fight.

4. AI & RIGHTS

Are AI Music Companies All Training on the Same Giant Datasets?

There's a question quietly gaining traction that could reshape the entire AI music infringement conversation: are generative AI companies actually training their models on shared, overlapping collections of copyrighted tracks, rather than each independently scraping the open web?

If that's true, and the evidence increasingly suggests it might be, the practical and legal implications are significant. A free-for-all scraping problem is one kind of mess. A systematic, traceable pattern of specific companies pulling from specific, identifiable datasets is a different and more prosecutable kind of problem entirely.

This isn't settled yet. But it's worth watching closely, because if these datasets get identified and named, the entire framing of the AI training debate could shift from abstract principle to concrete evidence.

5. PLATFORM RACE

Spotify and YouTube Are Now Racing Into Live Concert Streaming

Two of the biggest platforms in music just made moves into the same emerging territory simultaneously.

Spotify is now enabling artists to upload full-length music videos directly to the platform without going through a distributor, while separately moving to license live concert and festival video content. YouTube, watching the same opportunity, launched "Music Nights," an exclusive live concert series built for dedicated fans.

This is genuine platform competition, not a single company's strategic move. For independent artists, competition between platforms for your content and your audience's attention is leverage you should actually use. Before committing your live content exclusively to one platform, understand what each one is actually building and which one serves the relationship you're trying to build with your specific audience.

6. CATALOG MOVES

HarbourView Scores a Strategic Stake in Chaka Khan's Catalog

HarbourView Equity Partners has secured a multifaceted partnership with the former Rufus lead singer, extending beyond simple catalog acquisition into what the companies describe as "new creative ventures."

This continues a pattern worth tracking. Catalog investment firms are increasingly moving past passive royalty collection into active partnership structures with legacy artists, combining ownership stakes with ongoing creative collaboration. It's a more sophisticated model than the straightforward catalog sale era of a few years ago, and it signals that the firms with capital are thinking longer term about how to keep legacy catalogs commercially alive rather than simply banking the royalties.

7. DATA POINT

Streaming Subscribers Are Closing In on a Billion Worldwide

According to Midia Research's latest Music Subscriber Market Shares report, global music streaming subscribers reached 921.6 million by the end of 2025, growing 10.1% year over year. Spotify remains the clear leader in that count.

A billion paying subscribers is a milestone that would have seemed almost theoretical a decade into the streaming era's existence. The subscription model isn't plateauing. It's still expanding, and that expansion is the foundation underneath every other data point in this week's signals, including the royalty growth and consumer spending numbers further down this list.

8. INDUSTRY POWER

Live Nation Just Bought Its Second Argentina Venue This Month

Live Nation Entertainment has acquired a majority stake in Buenos Aires' Movistar Arena, giving the company its second Movistar Arena in South America following December's acquisition of the Santiago, Chile venue. This is also Live Nation's second deal in Argentina this month alone, following its announced plans to acquire a majority stake in promoter Dale Play Live.

Context matters here. This expansion is happening just weeks after the DOJ's antitrust trial against Live Nation ended in an abrupt settlement, one that former DOJ attorneys who built the case have publicly called a loss they believed they were on track to win.

Whatever that settlement actually protected, it clearly did not slow down Live Nation's appetite for venue consolidation. Independent artists, promoters, and venues operating anywhere near Live Nation's growing footprint should pay close attention to what continued expansion at this pace means for their own leverage.

9. MUSIC IS STILL MONEY

Music Is Worth More to Listeners Than It Used to Be

According to a new DIMA report, the average on-demand streaming user in the US now spends $434 per year on recorded music, up 27% since 2020.

That number is worth sitting with, especially against the backdrop of an ongoing and legitimate conversation about whether streaming has devalued music. Consumers are demonstrably paying more for music access than they were five years ago. The honest question this raises isn't whether music has value. It's whether that increased value is actually reaching the artists creating it, or primarily accumulating with the platforms and intermediaries positioned to collect it first.

Both things can be true. The system can be generating more revenue while still distributing that revenue unevenly. Holding that complexity, rather than collapsing it into a single simple narrative, is the more useful position for understanding where this industry is actually headed.

9 Signals drops every Friday. If someone forwarded this to you, subscribe so you don't miss next week.